|
|
Partial admission from Crown not enough. Could be up to 50 errors. Yes, the Certified court transcripts have been altered, we told you so. It's important to explain what has been going on at this point. This abortion of justice, or normal court case involving Survivors, was divided into 3 drawn-out parts, the one constant was the Court Clerk and the learned Judge Stephen Hunter. There were 3 different Crown Prosecutors and different Court Recorders; this is called plausible deniability. Every time we question something the State can and has responded with the I don't know I was not here for that. It appears the Crown has it's own idea how to manage this documented corruption of the system. Our view is this, if the State is allowed to alter the transcripts, whether by design or convenient error, or malicious corruption the whole system of justice breaks down. The State must face some meaningful sanction to prevent this from occurring again. As of yet we have not even received an apology or explanation though we have asked for, in writing, a written apology. Even a blind dog knows the difference between being kicked in the head, and being accidentally tripped over or stepped on. If this was a mistake the very first order of business is a prompt, sincere, heartfelt and meaningful written apology, that has not happened. If you look at the application or motion to listen and correct the signed certified transcript, the sample of errors is listed in reverse chronological order, the Crown has started to address this crisis of due process in this fashion. So we will continue in this method. Before we get started, lets review the sample, the first two of (many others have not yet been mentioned) serious falsehoods attributed to this Court Recorder. Through Government error I have been accused by the Government for being a child abuser, and a very stupid criminal. A mistake in the certified transcript has me being so stupid and criminal that while under court order to have no contact with the person who falsely accused me, I disregarded the rule of law, human decency and common sense, and stupidly decided to now respond to the volumes of text, audio and video taped harassment, assaults and other hate crimes I had ignored. God knows I'm not very smart, but I'm certainly not that stupid. I expect the Crown's view is that while all the alterations hurt the defence, assist the State to help justify this wrong decision and appear to be well thought out and very linier, that is to say one alteration backs up or reinforces the next lie; this is a product of random chance. PLEASE NOTE THE CHART OF THE ODDS THAT ALL RANDOM ERRORS WOULD BENEFIT THE STATE, I MADE USING BOTH THE LAW OF AVERAGES AND THE CHAOS THEORY. Nope nothing corrupt or malicious going on here. I THINK THERE ARE 35 ALTERATIONS IN THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT THAT AID THE STATE'S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. But we will see when we listen to the tapes. Like the Young's fabricated evidence, there are obvious errors on the very first page of the transcripts. Has evidence gone missing? Or been altered as well? I didn't expect to enter evidence, I thought just playing an audio file of Mr Young's actions would be enough to prove he was a liar and end this maliciousness. Big error eh? I had one floppy disk in the disk drive of my laptop, and 4 very large audio files, 3 audio and one video. I did compress the audio file thus destroying the quality and was able to include a small version of a QuickTime video and wave audio file on one floppy. This is one disk. The other two very large audio files I had to record on an audio tape (remember I brought a tape recorder to tape the proceedings but was not allowed to) to be entered into evidence. Note now, that the evidence says 4 disks. I entered one disk and one tape, what happened to the tape or why was the record altered, we don't know yet. 1) Now then back to the alterations, while the Crown's star witness was charged with 16 new crimes relating to criminally harassing both Noel and I and that is in fact what I said, the certified transcript clearly states the obvious falsehood that I was charged with 16 new crimes. 2) The learned Judge and Crown felt it best they, the government investigate my life and put me under the microscope, they ordered a report to be written. There were many errors in the report. When we spoke to the Appeals Court Judge I stated there are many alterations we have not included in the motion, one example was that the learned Judge allowed me only 10 minutes to read, review and correct a document that was 8 pages long and took 8 weeks to make. That part was also removed from the transcript, even though the Court Recorder said over the phone that she remembered that occurring, and she could not explain why she didn't bother to include that. So the part before the admitted alteration was also altered. This change dovetails very well into the alteration, to make me look like a child abuser, but again the Crown would have us believe this was just random chance. Now seeing this major mistake, having only minutes to read, understand and correct the report, with the writer not in Court attendance I tried my best. I went on to say, that the report was incorrect, that because of multiple deaths in my family, while I was in fact granted a legal aid certificate to sue Rosseau Lake College because they, like others, turn a blind eye to child sex crimes. However I explained that the phrase I choice not to proceed was wrong, I was incapable of doing so. I do note two lawyers find this very understandable, as do all Survivors of child abuse. I went on to explain that I spoke to the Ontario disability administration people and they suggested I should now again plan on proceeding against Rosseau. That part has also been removed. Again the alleged random alteration dovetails very nicely into the previous changes. Also many other alterations in the certified transcript, also give any reader the wrong and malicious impression that I'm an abuser. We wonder why the Court Recorder and Crown didn't bother to note the text above and below the admitted alteration was also changed. Perhaps because it was altered, and they are still engaged in a failed cover-up. |
Audio/Video of Tim Young assaulting Andy using his van.
|
Click picture below to watch the Crown Attorney's Witness clearly out of control, trespassing at night and vandalizing our property. All of this during an 11 week break between my trial sessions.  Here is Court Darling Mr. Tim Young both violating a Court Order to stay off our property and trespassing at night. He was pounding on the door, had struck the porch light and was holding a 4x4 fence post screaming for Andy to come out and fight him. He had run down the fence post the day before with his van, by accident (he claims) then he quickly left the scene. We did call 911 and are trying to get that recording and police report. Not having been held accountable previously for setting our garage on fire this same way, now he was proceeding to use this same method on our home. This is all totally legal in Ontario apparently if done by a crown witness testifying against you for things that had not and could not have occurred. |
Visit our BLOG - It Doesn't Take a Brain Surgeon - or does it?
View the Time line of Events
|
